Bitcoin stalls around $86k, could dip lower; Check forecast


Bitcoin under pressure

Key takeaways

  • BTC is down by less than 1% in the last 24 hours and is currently trading below $87k.
  • It could dip lower if the bullish trend fails to prevail.

Bitcoin stalls around $86k

Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), and Ripple (XRP) prices hover around key levels following a positive start to the week. The price action of the leading cryptocurrencies suggests fading bearish momentum. 

However, the bulls have failed to push prices higher, and Bitcoin could revisit lower support levels in the near term. However, if the support levels hold, Bitcoin could rally higher over the next few days.

Analysts are optimistic that Bitcoin’s price could appreciate in the medium to long term. While commenting on the current market conditions, Coinbase UK CEO Keith Grose said,

“Market conditions are shifting as institutions across Europe take a more structured and regulated approach to digital assets. We’re seeing clearer frameworks emerge, stronger infrastructure being developed, and early examples of central banks and financial institutions running controlled pilots to build practical understanding – including the Czech National Bank’s recent decision to test a small, ring-fenced portfolio of digital assets.”

Bitcoin’s price could face further pressure

The BTC/USD 4-hour chart is bearish and efficient as Bitcoin has underperformed in the last 24 hours. The leading cryptocurrency found support around the $80k psychological level on Friday and has slightly bounced back since then. 

At press time, Bitcoin is trading around $86,800 per coin after failing to overcome the $90k resistance level. If the recovery continues, BTC could rally toward the next key resistance at $90,000.  The ILQ and TLQ levels above $92k could also serve as short-term targets for Bitcoin. 

BTC/USD 4H Chart

The Relative Strength Index (RSI) on the 4-hour chart reads 47, after slipping below the oversold threshold last week, suggesting that downside pressure is declining. The MACD lines are also close to the bullish zone as buyers remain in control.

However, if BTC fails to overcome the $90k resistance, it could extend the decline toward the key psychological level at $80,000.



Source link

MicroStrategy’s bitcoin empire signals structural challenges


Strategy Inc. (formerly MicroStrategy) spent 2025 building the largest corporate Bitcoin reserve the public markets have ever financed, but the scale of that ambition ended up colliding with the logic of its own stock.

What began as an aggressive accumulation strategy, powered by the company’s appetite for leverage and a willingness to dilute existing shareholders, evolved into a structural contradiction that now defines the firm.

A balance sheet swollen by Bitcoin, but a narrative stretched to breaking

Strategy has raised $21 billion across seven securities offerings in a single year to expand its holdings to roughly 641,000 BTC, a figure that now represents close to 3% of the asset’s finite supply.

Yet as the balance sheet grew to historic proportions, the equity story unraveled, leaving the stock 68% below its highs and forcing investors to reassess what kind of company they were actually buying into.

The shift did not happen suddenly. Over the past two quarters, institutions pared their exposure from $36.32 billion to $30.94 billion, a $5.38 billion retreat that reflected broader risk rotation across the market but also genuine discomfort with Strategy’s financing model.

The company no longer trades like a software developer or a technology platform. It moves in near lockstep with Bitcoin itself, yet its capital structure behaves like an experiment in perpetual leverage.

Investors are confronted with an entity that generates multi-billion-dollar profits when Bitcoin rallies and multi-billion-dollar losses when it falls. For many, the volatility was tolerable. It was the dilution layered on top of it that proved untenable.

A year of capital that redefined a company

The mechanics underpinning Strategy’s transformation show how aggressively the firm leaned into its thesis.

The firm stated that it issued $11.9 billion in common equity, $6.9 billion in preferred equity, and $2.0 billion in convertible debt, and used the proceeds to fund a persistent bid for Bitcoin throughout the year.

Strategy's Bitcoin Fundraise
Strategy’s Bitcoin Fundraise YTD (Source: Strategy)

The sequencing of these raises did more than enlarge the treasury; it recast the company’s identity. Each new round introduced more outstanding shares, weakened the claim of existing holders, and signaled that management prioritized reserve expansion over earnings stability or stock performance.

This approach might have been sustainable in a market that rewarded asymmetric exposure to Bitcoin’s upside.

But in a year when investors increasingly sought predictable cash flows and balanced operating models, Strategy’s structure made it difficult for large portfolios to justify continued exposure.

The company’s results are volatile by design, and its dilution is structural rather than cyclical. The combination pushed institutions toward firms with steadier fundamentals, leaving Strategy’s stock as a proxy for Bitcoin with a corporate wrapper attached.

Strategic custody realignment

The strategic shift extended beyond fundraising. Blockchain analysis platform Arkham Intelligence reported that Strategy moved roughly 58,000 BTC, about $5.1 billion, to Fidelity Digital Assets within two months.

It added:

“In total, Strategy holds 641,692 BTC ($56.14B) with a total of 165,709 BTC ($14.50B) sent to Fidelity Custody.”

Stategy's Bitcoin TransactionsStategy's Bitcoin Transactions
Strategy’s Recent Bitcoin Transactions (Source: Arkham Intelligence)

The decision reflects a broader recalibration of operational risk. After years of relying primarily on Coinbase as its custodian, the company adopted a multi-provider model that better aligns with the expectations of lenders and credit analysts, who prefer diversified custody arrangements.

The change came with tradeoffs. Fidelity operates an omnibus custody structure that aggregates client assets on-chain.

This model improves redundancy and satisfies institutional counterparty expectations, but it removes the direct visibility that once allowed analysts to track Strategy’s holdings through identifiable wallet clusters.

In the earlier setup, the company’s solvency profile could be monitored by cross-checking public addresses against corporate disclosures.

The omnibus framework replaces this real-time transparency with custodian statements and internal audit controls, which provide security and operational strength but reduce the external interpretability that retail traders and on-chain researchers once relied on.

Assessing MicroStrategy’s Bitcoin Debt Coverage

As the company’s debt stack grew, management introduced an unconventional metric to reassure bondholders and defend the leverage.

The Strategy “Bitcoin (BTC) Rating” measures the coverage of the convertible notes by comparing the market value of the Bitcoin treasury to the face value of the debt.

This ratio was designed to simplify the credit conversation by focusing on asset coverage rather than earnings variability, and early data suggest that the buffer is substantial.

At a Bitcoin price of $74,000, which aligns with Strategy’s aggregate cost basis, the coverage stands at 5.9 times. Notably, even a significant drawdown to $25,000 reduces the coverage to only 2.0 times, which still exceeds the face value of the obligations.

Strategy's Bitcoin Credit RatingStrategy's Bitcoin Credit Rating
Strategy’s Bitcoin Credit Rating (Source: Strategy)

For creditors, this framing provides comfort. The numbers indicate that Strategy retains significant collateral protection even in adverse scenarios.

Equity holders, however, see something different. The BTC Rating does not address the dilution required to sustain the treasury expansion, nor does it mitigate the volatility that directly flows into quarterly results.

Essentially, this shows that the firm’s creditors receive clarity on risk exposure, while shareholders absorb the structural consequences of continuous issuance.

The limits of the index system

The company’s unique financial profile also interacts awkwardly with index rules.

Strategy meets the market capitalization and liquidity thresholds for the S&P 500, but the index requires four consecutive quarters of positive earnings.

Because Strategy’s profits are mechanically tied to Bitcoin’s price fluctuations, the firm struggles to produce sustained earnings under the accounting framework S&P uses for eligibility.

In quarters where Bitcoin rises, Strategy’s reported profits soar. In quarters where Bitcoin retreats, the losses are equally significant. This volatility effectively bars the firm from the index and eliminates a substantial pool of passive demand that could otherwise support the stock.

That exclusion matters because Strategy’s liquidity and public float are ample enough that index inclusion would typically be a natural next step for a company of its size. Instead, the firm remains dependent on active investors who must evaluate the combined risks of leverage, dilution, and Bitcoin-linked earnings volatility.

The result is an increasingly bifurcated identity: a corporation that built a massive digital asset reserve financed through public markets, but whose equity value reflects the market’s skepticism about the sustainability of the strategy used to build it.

MicroStrategy’s reinvention

Strategy achieved something no other public company has attempted at this scale. It constructed a corporate Bitcoin reserve of unprecedented size, diversified its custodians, and engineered a novel debt coverage metric to stabilize its credit footprint.

The company proved that public markets would finance a multi-billion-dollar Bitcoin accumulation model and that operational infrastructure could evolve as quickly as its balance sheet.

What it has not secured is a stable equity narrative. Investors who once treated the stock as a leveraged proxy for Bitcoin now confront a capital structure that demands ongoing dilution to maintain its pace of accumulation.

Creditors feel protected by the asset coverage, while shareholders remain exposed to earnings swings and capital supply decisions. The market’s repricing reflects this tension.

The company delivered on its ambition to dominate the Bitcoin treasury landscape, but the approach that enabled it continues to weaken the very equity engine that funds it.

Mentioned in this article



Source link

Monad mainnet scam alerts rise as fake ERC20 transfers spread across new chain


Monad mainnet scam alerts rise as fake ERC20 transfers spread across new chain
  • Monad users reported spoofed ERC20 transfers within 48 hours of mainnet launch.
  • More than 76,000 wallets claimed 3.33 billion MON tokens in the airdrop.
  • Monad’s testnet recorded more than 2.6 billion transactions.

Monad’s first week on mainnet has drawn intense attention across the crypto community, but it has also revealed how quickly malicious tactics can surface on a new EVM chain.

The project went live only a day before users began spotting unusual ERC20 transfer notifications that appeared legitimate at first glance.

Reports across X on Tuesday, Nov. 25, showed that scammers were already attempting to mislead newcomers who were still getting used to the network’s tools.

The incident created confusion during a launch that has otherwise seen strong participation and rapid growth, especially around the airdrop and early trading activity.

Spoof alerts grow across new network

Several users highlighted that fabricated ERC20 token transfers were appearing on explorers and wallets within 48 hours of the mainnet debut. These events looked authentic but did not move funds or alter balances.

A post on X from Monad co-founder and chief technology officer James Hunsaker drew early attention to the problem, as he warned that scammers were broadcasting fabricated transfers that appeared to come from his wallet.

The issue emerged because ERC20 is only an interface standard, which allows any contract to emit logs that resemble transfer activity even when no tokens are involved.

This behaviour is common across new EVM ecosystems, especially during traffic spikes when users rush to test fresh applications.

Screenshots circulating online showed transactions that looked like genuine movements of assets, which contributed to early confusion.

Social engineering links drive the activity

The appearance of these fake transfers formed part of a broader attempt to direct users toward phishing pages, claim buttons, or malicious contract approvals.

Spoofing has long been used to trick users into believing they have received unexpected tokens or triggered actions they did not initiate.

The tactic relies on creating urgency so that users interact with unsafe links.

As activity increased, the hashtag #MonadScam briefly trended on X before interest settled.

The network stated that the incident was not an exploit and noted that no funds were lost.

Many users also noted that wallet balances remained unchanged, which helped clarify the situation once the warnings spread.

Launch activity and airdrop hype fuel attention

Monad launched with significant momentum, which contributed to the early surge in attention from attackers.

More than 76,000 wallets claimed 3.33 billion MON tokens in the airdrop round, worth about $105 million at the time.

The demand created an ideal moment for malicious actors who were already familiar with earlier phishing attempts that imitated Monad’s airdrop portal.

The chain has been one of the most active debuts of the year, supported by more than 280 projects at launch.

The network is built by former Jump Trading engineers and is positioned as a high-performance, EVM-compatible chain.

Funding has exceeded $260 million from backers such as Paradigm, Electric Capital, and OKX Ventures.

Its testnet recorded more than 2.6 billion transactions, more than 300 million wallets, and 41 million blocks. These early figures contributed to heavy interest during the mainnet rollout, which made the environment more attractive to scammers looking to exploit user excitement.

Token activity rises as users stay cautious

MON opened at $0.02, and after an initial drop, the token gained more than 50% and traded near $0.045 at press time.

Monad price
Source: CoinMarketCap

Increased interaction across dApps and explorers has encouraged the team to advise users to avoid urgency prompts, rely on verified explorers, and double-check contract engagements as mainnet traffic continues to rise.

The combination of rapid adoption, large airdrop participation, and growing traction across the ecosystem has made security awareness a priority during the early phase of the network.



Source link

Deutsche Börse Expands Multi-Stablecoin Rails Under MiCA


Market infrastructure provider Deutsche Börse plans to integrate the EURAU euro-pegged stablecoin issued by AllUnity, expanding the exchange group’s digital-asset strategy following earlier ties with Circle’s Euro Coin (EURC) and Societe Generale-Forge’s EUR CoinVertible (EURCV).

According to a Wednesday announcement shared with Cointelegraph, Deutsche Börse plans to integrate EURAU into its financial market infrastructure, starting with institutional custody through its central securities depository arm, Clearstream. The announcement also promised a future “integration of the euro stablecoin across the entire service portfolio.”

This would integrate the stablecoin into a sizable and growing market. According to World Federation of Exchanges data, Deutsche Börse’s domestic equity market capitalization is about $2.23 trillion with 474 listed companies.

The two companies signed a memorandum of understanding, but have not yet shared a specific date for when the new features will go live. AllUnity CEO Alexander Höptner said that the partnership is “making onchain cross-border payments and digital assets accessible to institutional market participants.”

Deutsche Börse Group executive board member Stephanie Eckermann said the “goal is to build a seamless bridge between the established financial world and the future of digital assets.” She added that this partnership is an important part of the effort and that embedding institutional-grade stablecoins allows clients “to confidently explore new possibilities in digital finance.”

Europe, Euro, European Union, Deutsche Börse, Stablecoin, MiCA
Deutsche Börse headquarters. Source: Wikimedia

Deutsche Börse and AllUnity had not responded to Cointelegraph’s inquiry by time of publication.

Related: Stablecoin panic could upend ECB policy, Dutch central bank governor warns

Deutsche Börse expands euro stablecoin strategy

Deutsche Börse’s EURAU integration follows its partnership with major stablecoin issuer Circle to adopt its EURC token in late September. Earlier this month, the company also announced that it had partnered with Societe Generale-Forge to integrate its EURCV stablecoin.

With this latest deal, Deutsche Börse appears to be playing the stablecoin game on all fronts, adding EURAU, issued by a German BaFin-licensed e-money institution. This complements EURCV, a bank-tied stablecoin, as Societe Generale-Forge is the blockchain arm of major French multinational bank Societe Generale; EURC comes from a US tech-sector issuer.

Related: Aave to offer zero-fee stablecoin ramps in Europe after MiCA approval

EU stablecoin adoption is taking shape with MiCA

While not leading to as many headlines as the United States, the European Union is also making progress in stablecoin adoption following the full introduction of the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) framework at the end of 2024. The announcement noted that the partnership “aligns with MiCA” and “represents a tangible step toward digitizing European markets and enhancing settlement and liquidity processes.”

Höptner said, “Europe is taking a global lead in regulated digital finance.”

Still, while picking up speed, stablecoin adoption remains low in Europe. Earlier this month, financial stability experts at the European Central Bank (ECB) said stablecoin-related risks in the euro area were limited due to low adoption and preventative regulation.

Some analyses point to euro stablecoins as a response to concerns that US dollar-backed stablecoins could threaten the European Union’s monetary independence. “Europe should not be dependent on US dollar-denominated stablecoins, which are currently dominating markets,” Pierre Gramegna, the managing director of the European Stability Mechanism, said earlier this month.

The industry is also seeing increasing involvement by local traditional financial players. In mid-October, Franco-German banking group ODDO BHF launched a stablecoin pegged to the euro under the MiCA framework.

In late September, a group of major European banks joined forces to launch a euro-pegged stablecoin under MiCA. The list of nine banks includes Dutch lender ING and Italy’s UniCredit.