Shutdown wipes out October CPI, leaving Bitcoin hanging


For months, crypto traders have timed leverage, funding, and liquidity around the monthly U.S. inflation print.

This week, those who had hoped the recent vote to reopen the government would bring new macro data were disappointed to find nothing on the tape. The Bureau of Labor Statistics said in October that

“No other releases will be rescheduled or produced until the resumption of regular government services.”

The last completed CPI report, covering September, was released late on October 24, following the shutdown’s interruption of normal operations.

The all-items index level came in at 324.80, with headline and core inflation both at 3.0% year-over-year. Trading Economics currently lists December 10 as the next scheduled date on the CPI calendar.

Why the Missing October Print Matters for Markets

There is now a gap for October that may never be filled. Because the shutdown covered the full data-collection period, field staff were unable to gather the price sample that underpins CPI. That may be collated and included in the December update, but the indication is that there will now be a gap.

White House Press Secretary blamed the gap on the Democrats, asserting,

“The Democrats may have permanently damaged the Federal Statistical System with October CPI and jobs reports likely never being released.”

Without that survey, the BLS could not post an update on Nov. 13, the standard date when markets would have received the October reading. Officials have signaled that October may not be reconstructable even after operations return to normal, as there is no primary data to benchmark against.

For crypto markets, the absence of a number mattered more than any hypothetical value. Bitcoin and Ethereum entered the week positioned for a volatility event that never materialized. Though volatility came regardless.

Spot Bitcoin fell around 6% over the session, along with a sea of red across the entire crypto market. Liquidity remains thin, and derivatives open interest edged lower, a behavior that aligns with a market waiting for macroeconomic information that did not materialize.

The missing CPI broke the usual chain that connects inflation data to crypto price action.

Normally, a softer print feeds expectations for a less restrictive Federal Reserve path. Treasury yields edge down, the dollar weakens, and risk assets, including Bitcoin, catch a bid.

A hotter print does the opposite, firming expectations for tighter policy and pressuring long-duration assets.

With no data, rates desks had no fresh input for real yields or breakeven inflation. The Fed outlook shifts to a trade on speeches, market-based inflation swaps, and secondary indicators.

That macro vacuum pushed crypto further into its role as a proxy for expectations about future policy rather than a simple high-beta extension of equities.

Without CPI, desks leaned more on liquidity, ETF flows, and options positioning. Funding rates on major futures pairs compressed as new directional leverage stayed on the sidelines.

All of this redirects attention to Dec. 10, the next date on the CPI calendar. Trading Economics lists that day as the “next release,” although the value field is empty, emphasizing that it is a placeholder rather than a confirmed dataset.

The Market Impact of October’s Unfillable CPI Gap

Markets now have to price three broad paths for what that date could bring.

One path is for the BLS to manage the reconstruction of some form of October CPI using partial samples, imputation, or model-based estimates.

If that happens, traders may treat the number as lower quality than a normal print, since the underlying survey would not follow the standard methodology. Reaction in crypto could be modest.

If the headline monthly change lands at 0.2% or below, consistent with a controlled disinflation trend, the usual pattern would be dollar softness, a pullback in yields, and a Bitcoin bounce.

Ethereum is likely to outperform over the next one to two days as traders re-engage with higher-beta risk. Smaller altcoins tend to follow, often moving in the 5–12% range once liquidity shifts down the risk curve.

If the reconstructed number or a clean November print falls in a “sticky” zone around 0.3–0.4% month-on-month, the message for policy becomes less clear.

Yields may move in a narrow range, and crypto could end the day close to where it started. Bitcoin may trade flat, with altcoins underperforming as traders cut marginal risk.

Funding rates in perpetual futures could slide into slightly negative territory as short-term hedging flows dominate.

A third path is that inflation data comes in hot at 0.5% or above. That outcome would strengthen expectations that the Fed needs to keep policy tight for longer, pulling the dollar higher and pushing Treasury yields up across the curve.

In previous episodes, such combinations have been associated with a 3–6% intraday drop in Bitcoin, sharper moves in Ethereum, and a broad deleveraging in altcoins.

Liquidation volumes in such washouts often run two to four times above recent norms as overleveraged positions are forced out.

How the CPI Void Reshapes Short-Term Macro Trading

The more unusual scenario is that Dec. 10 arrives with no October CPI at all because the BLS decides the missing survey cannot be credibly reconstructed or additional delays occur in the pipeline.

In that world, the next clean reading would reflect November conditions, and the gap between hard inflation data points would stretch to almost two months.

Treasuries would need to lean more heavily on breakeven markets and inflation swaps to anchor expectations. The term’ premium across the curve’ could embed a fatter risk buffer for the uncertainty surrounding true price dynamics.

Trading Economics currently forecasts continued inflation pressure into next year, with CPI rising month-on-month.

US CPI forecast (Source: TradingEconomics)
US CPI forecast (Source: TradingEconomics)

For digital assets, a world with unreliable or irregular inflation data introduces a new kind of macro regime.

Crypto becomes more of a “macro-smoothed” asset class, trading on slower-moving forces such as ETF flows, structural demand from long-only allocators, corporate balance sheet decisions, and the plumbing of dollar liquidity.

Short-term volatility driven by scheduled data would fall, replaced by longer episodes of uncertainty punctuated by policy communication and idiosyncratic crypto events.

That regime would likely reinforce Bitcoin’s status as the sector’s benchmark. When macroeconomic uncertainty is high but data are sparse, traders have a lower appetite for tokens farther out on the risk spectrum.

Capital tends to consolidate into assets with deeper liquidity, clearer narratives, and more developed derivatives markets. Altcoins that rely on high leverage or speculative momentum for price support may find these conditions scarce until regular macroeconomic releases resume.

The CPI gap also elevates the importance of alternative data sources and nowcasting models that attempt to infer inflation from high-frequency inputs such as card spending, freight rates, or online prices.

Traditional macro desks already track those indicators, but without a monthly BLS checkpoint, they carry more weight.

Crypto traders may have to incorporate such tools more systematically if the formal inflation pipeline remains unstable.

For now, the CPI story is not about an upside or downside surprise but about an empty line in the macro calendar.

The last confirmed reading shows a 324.80 index level for September with 3.0% inflation on both headline and core measures.

The next entry is a blank field on Dec. 10 that may or may not contain October’s missing data. Crypto markets are trading around this absence, waiting to see whether the world’s most-watched inflation gauge reappears or whether the macro vacuum persists.

Mentioned in this article



Source link

UAE makes Bitcoin wallets a crime risk in global tech crackdown


UAE makes Bitcoin wallets a crime risk in global tech crackdown
  • The UAE’s Federal-Decree Law No. 6 of 2025 came into effect on 16 September.
  • Article 62 places APIs, explorers, and decentralised platforms under Central Bank control.
  • Article 61 regulates all marketing, emails, and online posts about crypto services.

In a sharp pivot from its crypto-friendly image, the United Arab Emirates has enacted sweeping new legislation that classifies basic cryptocurrency infrastructure, including Bitcoin wallets, as potentially criminal unless licensed by the Central Bank.

Legal experts from Gibson Dunn have flagged the law’s scope as unusually broad, warning that its language introduces significant risk for global technology providers.

This shift, embedded in Federal-Decree Law No. 6 of 2025, comes into force from 16 September and carries global consequences for developers and platforms offering crypto access.

The law replaces the 2018 banking statute and significantly widens the definition of financial activity. What sets this legislation apart is not only its scope but also its enforcement teeth.

Penalties for non-compliance range from fines of AED 50,000 to AED 500,000,000 (up to $136,000,000) and may include imprisonment.

Importantly, this applies not just to entities operating within the UAE but also to those whose products are accessible from within the country.

Licensing now applies to wallets, APIs and even analytics

The most consequential element of the new law is found in Article 62. It grants the Central Bank control over any technology that “engages in, offers, issues, or facilitates” financial activity.

The wording is broad enough to encompass self-custodial wallets, API services, blockchain explorers, analytics platforms, and even decentralised protocols.

This marks a fundamental change in how crypto infrastructure is regulated in the UAE.

Previously, licensing obligations focused on traditional financial entities, but the updated framework shifts this focus to include software and data tools.

According to developer analysis, even public-facing tools such as CoinMarketCap and open-source Bitcoin wallets may now require licensing to remain accessible within the UAE.

For the first time, developers may face criminal penalties for offering unlicensed crypto tools, even if they are based abroad.

This extension of jurisdiction signals a new regulatory posture that treats access to crypto as tightly as its ownership or exchange.

Communications and marketing now fall under regulation

The crackdown does not stop at financial infrastructure. Article 61 of the same law defines the marketing, promotion, or advertising of financial services as a licensable activity.

In practice, this means that simply hosting a website, publishing an article, or sharing a tweet about an unlicensed crypto service could be considered a legal violation if that content reaches UAE residents.

This change dramatically expands the compliance footprint for companies and developers.

Gibson Dunn highlights that these provisions materially broaden the enforcement perimeter, especially for firms with no formal presence in the UAE.

The law applies to communications that originate outside the country but are accessible inside it.

The result is a regulatory landscape where developers, content creators, and infrastructure providers must weigh whether their platforms are indirectly accessible by users in the UAE.

In many cases, avoiding legal exposure may require disabling access or halting service altogether.

Dubai’s free zones no longer shield crypto services

Over recent years, the UAE has positioned itself as a hub for blockchain innovation.

Jurisdictions such as Dubai’s Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA) and Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM) attracted global attention with purpose-built crypto licensing frameworks.

However, the new federal law overrides these free-zone arrangements, asserting Central Bank control nationwide.

Federal law supersedes any rules introduced by the UAE’s free zones, effectively dissolving the regulatory arbitrage that once drew companies to Dubai.

The broader context includes the country’s history of digital restrictions.

For instance, WhatsApp voice calls remain blocked across the UAE, reinforcing a consistent policy approach to centralised control over communications and digital tools.

While this may bring the UAE in closer alignment with international pressure from groups like the Financial Action Task Force, it also puts crypto service providers in a difficult position.

In other jurisdictions facing similar pressure, firms have withdrawn entirely to avoid enforcement risk.

Enforcement begins in 2026, with further rules expected

Entities have a one-year window from 16 September 2025 to come into compliance. This grace period may be extended at the discretion of the Central Bank.

During this time, further regulations are expected to clarify how these broad rules will be applied in practice.

Despite this, the scope of the law is already causing concern.

The language around facilitation and communication, combined with the severe penalties under Article 170, suggests that firms offering crypto tools globally must now consider the risk of incidental exposure to UAE users.

For software developers and platform operators, this marks a significant departure from the norms of decentralised access and open-source innovation.



Source link

Alibaba Mulls Deposit Token Amid China’s Stablecoin Pushback


The cross-border e-commerce arm of Chinese tech behemoth Alibaba is working on a deposit token amid mainland China’s crackdown on stablecoins, according to CNBC.

Alibaba president Kuo Zhang told CNBC in a Friday report that the tech giant plans to use stablecoin-like technology to streamline overseas transactions. The model under consideration is a deposit token, which is a blockchain-based instrument that represents a direct claim on commercial bank deposits and is treated as a regulated liability of the issuing bank.

Traditional stablecoins, which these tokens closely resemble, are issued by a private entity and backed by assets to maintain their value. The report follows JPMorgan Chase — the world’s biggest bank by market capitalization — reportedly rolling out its deposit token to institutional clients earlier this week.

The news also follows reports that Chinese technology giants, including Ant Group and JD.com, suspended plans to issue stablecoins in Hong Kong after regulators in Beijing expressed displeasure with the plans. The report is just the latest of many suggesting that mainland Chinese authorities appear dead set on preventing a stablecoin industry from arising in the country.

Alibaba offices. Source: Wikimedia

China says no to stablecoins

In July, both Ant Group and JD expressed interest in participating in Hong Kong’s pilot stablecoin program or launching tokenized financial products, such as digital bonds. Similarly, HSBC and the world’s largest bank by total assets — the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China — were reported to share these Hong Kong stablecoin ambitions in early September.

Related: Columbia Business professor casts doubt on tokenized bank deposits

Later in September, a now-removed report by Chinese financial outlet Caixin claimed that Chinese firms operating in Hong Kong may be forced to withdraw from cryptocurrency-related activities. According to the report, policymakers would also impose restrictions on mainland companies’ investments in crypto and cryptocurrency exchanges.

In early August, Chinese authorities reportedly instructed local firms to cease publishing research and holding seminars related to stablecoins, citing concerns that stablecoins could be exploited as a tool for fraudulent activities. Still, China is not entirely devoid of stablecoin ties.

Related: Custodia, Vantage Bank launch platform for tokenized deposits

Offshore yuan stablecoins, not mainland money

In late July, Chinese blockchain Conflux announced a third version of its public network and introduced a new stablecoin backed by offshore Chinese yuan. Still, the stablecoin aims to serve offshore Chinese entities and countries involved in China’s Belt and Road Initiative — not the mainland.

In late September, a regulated stablecoin tied to the international version of the Chinese yuan launched. Still, this product is also intended for foreign exchange markets and was launched at the Belt and Road Summit in Hong Kong, signalling a similar target market.

In fact, a recent analysis suggests that we should not expect Chinese stablecoins to be allowed to circulate in the mainland. Joshua Chu, co-chair of the Hong Kong Web3 Association, said that “China is unlikely to issue stablecoins onshore.”

Magazine: Hong Kong isn’t the loophole Chinese crypto firms think it is