Singapore’s MAS grants Ripple wider payment permissions as APAC demand surges


MAS grants Ripple wider payment permissions
  • MAS expands Ripple’s payment permissions for XRP and RLUSD services.
  • The approval boosts Ripple’s role in fast, regulated APAC cross-border payments.
  • Regional digital asset activity rises as Ripple deepens Singapore investment.

The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) has approved an expanded range of payment activities for Ripple Markets APAC, the company’s local subsidiary.

This approval allows Ripple to grow its regulated payment services for banks, fintechs, and corporates in one of the world’s most tightly supervised financial markets.

Ripple can now offer a wider suite of digital payment token services linked to XRP and RLUSD.

It also gives the firm more room to deliver cross-border payment solutions that rely on digital assets to settle transactions faster and at a lower cost.

Ripple’s leaders say this development reflects the value of Singapore’s clear regulatory stance.

President Monica Long described MAS as a global benchmark for transparency and stable rules.

She said the decision strengthens Ripple’s plan to deepen its investment in the market and build infrastructure that supports faster global money movement.

MAS’s frameworks under the Payment Services Act give digital asset firms defined rules covering token issuance, custody, and payments.

Expansion aligned with rising APAC demand

The approval marks a surge in digital asset activity in the Asia-Pacific region, with a year-over-year increase of about 70%.

Ripple says Singapore sits at the centre of this growth thanks to its advanced policies and its early embrace of regulated digital token services.

Fiona Murray, Ripple’s Vice President and Managing Director for the region, said the expanded license equips the company to serve the institutions driving that growth.

She noted that regulated payment rails remain essential as cross-border activity accelerates across regional markets.

Ripple first established its Asia-Pacific headquarters in Singapore in 2017.

The company later secured a full MPI license, placing it among a select group of blockchain-focused firms approved to provide digital token services in the country.

Broader capabilities for institutional clients

With the updated permissions, Ripple can now support end-to-end payment flows through a single integration.

This includes collection, holding, token swaps, and payouts.

The system enables clients to avoid multiple infrastructure partners and reduces their reliance on additional banking relationships.

Ripple Payments, the company’s global solution, merges digital tokens with a payout network that handles conversion, compliance, and settlement operations.

By absorbing the technical and blockchain complexity, Ripple enables institutions to offer digital payment services more efficiently.

The company’s stablecoin, RLUSD, sits at the core of several of these services.

The stablecoin recently received recognition in Abu Dhabi as an Accepted Fiat-Referenced Token, allowing licensed firms in the Abu Dhabi Global Market to use it for regulated financial activities.

This adds momentum to Ripple’s broader expansion across the UAE and Asia.



Source link

Israel signals tougher stablecoin rules as digital shekel plans speed up


Israel signals tougher stablecoin rules as digital shekel plans speed up
  • Israel plans tighter stablecoin oversight as adoption surges globally.
  • Regulators warn dominance of Tether and Circle poses systemic risk.
  • Digital shekel roadmap advances for 2026 as CBDC development accelerates.

Israel is moving towards tighter supervision of stablecoins as the Bank of Israel positions them as a core part of the country’s future payments system.

The shift comes as regulators reassess how private digital dollars fit into daily financial flows.

Stablecoins are no longer seen as fringe tokens used only by crypto traders. Instead, they are being treated as major payment instruments with global scale and influence.

The Bank of Israel Governor Amir Yaron used the Payments in the Evolving Era conference in Tel Aviv to outline how regulatory demands will rise as stablecoin adoption continues to grow.

Rising pressure from global adoption

The Bank of Israel stressed that global stablecoin usage has expanded to levels that can no longer be ignored.

The sector has passed a market capitalisation of more than $300 billion, with monthly transaction volumes above $2 trillion.

As per CoinDesk, officials noted that these levels place stablecoins on par with the balance sheets of mid-sized international commercial banks.

This surge has been driven by their role in trading, cross-border transfers, and the need for a digital instrument that avoids the price swings of other cryptocurrencies.

The expanding footprint creates new urgency for clear, enforceable rules.

Concerns over market concentration

A key theme at the conference was the dominance of two stablecoin issuers.

About 99% of market activity is tied to Tether and Circle, creating a heavy concentration of risk in a sector that underpins a large share of digital asset transactions.

Israeli policymakers warned that this structure heightens systemic vulnerability.

They view that any disruption or weakness at the issuer level could ripple through global payment channels.

To mitigate this, officials highlighted the need for strict reserve practices, including fully backed 1:1 reserves and liquid assets that can handle sudden redemption waves.

Digital shekel plans move forward

Alongside the stablecoin discussion, Israel advanced its own central bank digital currency plans.

Yoav Soffer, who leads the digital shekel project, described the currency as central bank money designed for broad use.

He released a 2026 roadmap that sets out the next stages and confirmed that official recommendations are expected by the end of this year.

The update signals an acceleration similar to moves made by the European Central Bank.

Industry observers noted that the faster timeline reflects how central banks are adjusting to competition from private digital money and the rapid evolution of the payments landscape.

The roadmap triggered commentary within the crypto sector.

Attention centred on how the Bank of Israel’s accelerated schedule positions the digital shekel as a response to fast-growing private alternatives.

Market participants linked the timing to a broader global trend in which central banks are racing to modernise their own digital money strategies.

With stablecoins gaining influence in international transactions, the digital shekel project is being viewed as a strategic step to maintain control over national payments infrastructure while supporting innovation in regulated channels.



Source link

Bitcoin ETFs end brutal November with a late $70M inflow


US-listed Bitcoin ETFs capped their second-heaviest month of redemptions with a rare late-month shift back into positive flows.

According to SoSo Value data, the 12 US-listed spot Bitcoin funds recorded net creation of roughly $70 million in the final days of November, after four weeks of relentless selling pressure that totalled more than $4.3 billion in net outflows.

US Bitcoin ETF Flow
Chart showing the net inflows and outflows for spot Bitcoin ETFs in the US from Oct. 31 to Nov. 28, 2025  (Source: SoSo Value)

Despite the modest nominal reversal, the timing of this brief respite from outflows suggests a critical exhaustion of seller momentum.

Considering this, the market enters December in a fragile equilibrium, caught between a constructive supply shock and a disjointed macroeconomic calendar that threatens to leave policymakers and traders flying blind.

Bitcoin ETFs and their poor November

November served as an actual structural stress test for the mature ETF complex, confirming what the market has long believed: these products are now the unequivocal price-setters for the asset class.

Last month, Bitcoin ETFs recorded $3.48 billion in net outflows, the deepest negative print since February.

The composition of the exit suggests a broad-based tactical retreat rather than a fundamental capitulation.

BlackRock’s IBIT, which is typically the sector’s liquidity vacuum, led the outflows, shedding $2.34 billion. This marks a significant rotation for a fund that has dominated inflows for most of the year.

US Bitcoin ETFs FlowUS Bitcoin ETFs Flow
Chart showing the inflows and outflows for Spot Bitcoin ETFs in 2025 (Source: Trader T)

Fidelity’s FBTC saw $412.5 million in redemptions, while Grayscale’s GBTC continued its slow bleed with $333 million in outflows. Ark Invest’s ARKB and VanEck’s HODL also saw capital flight, recording exits of $205.8 million and $121.9 million, respectively.

Yet, the bearish impulse revealed a silver lining regarding market depth.

Despite a nearly $3.5 billion monthly exit, Bitcoin price action defended the mid-$80,000s, refusing to break market structure to the downside. This resilience implies that while tactical capital retreated to lock in year-to-date gains, underlying demand remained sticky.

Still, the cumulative net inflows for spot Bitcoin ETFs since January 2024 sit at a robust $57.71 billion, and the funds collectively hold approximately $120 billion in assets.

The multiplier effect

The significance of the late-November stabilization is best understood through the mechanics of network issuance, which gives ETFs outsized leverage in price discovery.

Following the 2024 Bitcoin halving, the network’s block subsidy dropped to 3.125 BTC per block, capping daily coin issuance at roughly 450.

At current valuations, this equates to roughly $38 million to $40 million in daily new sell pressure from miners. In this supply-constrained environment, even a “trickle” of ETF inflows can act as a powerful lever.

So, net creations in the $50 million to $100 million daily range are sufficient to absorb the entire daily issuance multiple times over. This means that when flows turn positive, market makers are forced to bid up spot inventory to satisfy creation units, as there is no structural surplus of new coins to dampen the demand.

Conversely, this leverage works against the price during periods of liquidation. The sustained $100 million-plus daily outflows seen throughout November forced issuers to return Bitcoin to the market, requiring liquidity providers to absorb not only the 450 new coins minted daily but also thousands of coins from unwinding ETF baskets.

If the $70 million net inflow seen last week continues, the supply-demand dynamics shift back in favor of price support, removing the artificial supply overhang that defined November.

December’s macro visibility gap

While the internal market structure appears to be healing, the external macro environment presents a unique risk for December.

Bitcoin investors are preparing for an unusual disconnect in the economic calendar as the Federal Reserve’s Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meets on Dec. 9–10.

Still, the next Consumer Price Index (CPI) reading will not be released until Dec. 18, following the shutdown-related cancellation of October’s data collection.

This sequence creates a “blind flight” scenario. The Federal Reserve will be forced to set the tone for interest rates and update its economic projections without the most critical data point markets use to anchor inflation expectations.

This is a dangerous ambiguity for Bitcoin, which remains highly correlated to global liquidity conditions and real rates.

Market participants will be forced to extrapolate policy intent from guidance rather than hard numbers. A hawkish tilt from Chair Jerome Powell could rapidly tighten financial conditions, especially if it is delivered without the counter-narrative of inflation data.

In a scenario where the Fed signals “higher for longer” to hedge against the missing data, the conditions that drove November’s drawdown could quickly re-emerge, punishing risk assets before the CPI print can validate or refute the central bank’s stance.

Meanwhile, the macro disconnect is further complicated by seasonality.

December liquidity typically thins significantly as hedge funds and institutional desks lock in annual performance and reduce gross exposure heading into the holiday season. In a thin market, order books become shallower, meaning smaller flow numbers can trigger outsized price moves.

Bitcoin ETFs flow equation

Considering the above, market participants are increasingly framing December through flow bands rather than directional price targets, reflecting how tightly ETF activity now anchors Bitcoin’s trading range.

If net creations hold in the $50 million to $100 million band, the complex would absorb roughly 11,500 BTC for every $1 billion in inflows at an $86,800 reference price, equivalent to 25 to 50 times daily issuance.

Flow Band (Daily Net Flows) Monthly Impact BTC Absorption (per $1B inflows at $86,800/BTC) Issuance Multiple Market Implication
+$150M to +$200M +$3B to +$4B ~11,500 BTC per $1B 25x–50x Strong upward pressure; liquidity tightens across venues
+$50M to +$100M +$1B to +$2B ~11,500 BTC per $1B 25x–50x Structural support; ETFs absorb multiples of daily issuance
–$50M to –$150M –$1B to –$3B N/A (net selling) N/A Recreates November’s dynamic; market makers forced to source BTC; elevated volatility
0 to +$50M Flat to +$1B Modest absorption Slightly > issuance Neutral to mildly supportive; stability depends on macro tone
Below –$150M Worse than –$3B N/A N/A Severe liquidity stress; accelerates downside in thin year-end markets

However, a move back into outflows within the $50 million to $150 million zone would recreate November’s pressure, but in a market contending with even thinner year-end liquidity.

In that setting, policy uncertainty and reduced market depth tend to amplify volatility, leaving ETF flows as the dominant force shaping Bitcoin’s direction into the new year.

Mentioned in this article



Source link

South Korea’s Government Expects Stablecoin Draft by Dec. 10


South Korean lawmakers are pressing financial regulators to deliver a draft stablecoin bill by a deadline set for later this month, as disagreements over the role of banks continue to stall progress.

According to a Monday report by a local news outlet, Maeil Business Newspaper, South Korea’s ruling party sent a “last-minute notice” to financial regulators to submit a stablecoin regulatory framework draft by Dec. 10.

Kang Joon-hyun, a lawmaker from the Democratic Party, said, “If the government bill does not come over within this deadline, we will take a drive through legislation by the secretary of the political affairs committee.” If it is delivered in time, he expects the bill will be discussed at the extraordinary session of the National Assembly in January 2026.

The Financial Services Commission (FSC) later issued a statement saying “no decision had been finalized regarding the formation of a consortium for issuing a KRW-denominated stablecoin.” The regulator confirmed that stablecoin regulation was discussed on Monday during a ruling party–government consultation, and both sides agreed to prepare the government bill as quickly as possible.

Asia, Central Bank, South Korea, Stablecoin
South Korea’s Financial Services Commission headquarters in Seoul. Source: Wikimedia

Related: South Korea targets sub-$680 crypto transfers in sweeping AML crackdown

No agreement yet on bank-led model

Despite earlier reports, “no concrete decision has been made on matters such as allowing a consortium in which banks hold 51% or more of equity,” the FSC said. The news follows late November reports that South Korea is likely to end the year without a framework for locally issued stablecoins, amid ongoing disputes over the role of banks in stablecoin issuance.

The Bank of Korea (BOK) and other financial regulators clashed over the extent of banks’ involvement in issuing Korean won-pegged stablecoins. The central bank expected banks to own at least 51% of any stablecoin issuer seeking regulatory approval in the country, while regulators want a more diverse ecosystem.

Related: South Korea ramps up crypto seizures, will target cold wallets

Why a majority bank ownership?

A BOK official said at the time that banks “are already under regulatory oversight and have extensive experience handling Anti-Money Laundering protocols,” making them a good option for a stablecoin issuer.

Sangmin Seo, the chair of the Kaia DLT Foundation, told Cointelegraph in late October that the central bank’s argument for banks leading a rollout “seems to lack a logical foundation.” He argued that a better solution would be to establish clear rules for issuers instead. He added:

“It would be even more valuable if the Bank of Korea could provide guidelines on how these risks can be mitigated and what qualifications are required for an issuer to be regarded as trustworthy.“

This was discussed again during Monday’s meeting, with an official from Kang’s office saying that the ruling party was “looking for a point of contact, considering both the stability of the BOK’s monetary policy and the industrial innovation emphasized by the [FSC]”.

Magazine: Koreans ‘pump’ alts after Upbit hack, China BTC mining surge: Asia Express